- What do you call yourself?
- Why do you not believe?
Lets take the first question to start.
I try not to label my lack of a religion or god(s). The labels that are put on "atheists" can be put on any person of faith. They do not follow all the other gods that man has created. If you are a Christian, then you do not believe in the Hindu gods and vis versa. So in the words of Stephen Roberts:
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
However, I do consider myself a skeptic and secularist.
Now lets take the second.
This question is a bit more complicated than the previous. I want to tackle this question in three parts (1) why I don't consider the bible a credible source, (2) why I don't follow an organized religion, and (3) why I do not believe in god.
Part 1: Why I do not consider the bible a credible source for anything.
If you believe a person can live in a whale, people can be born of virgins, a person can rise from the dead, talking snakes, and all the other fantastic stories then you need to grow up. Now if your retort is "those are just stories to learn from and to guide us", well that is a somewhat reasonable explanation. However, how do you choose what stories are fiction and which are non-fiction?
The bible is a man made collection of fairy tales and contradictions. The old testament describes a vengeful and jealous god and the new testament was not written until centuries about Christ. How can we expect these stories to be accurate when a simple story can't pass through a small classroom of students without being changed drastically. If there is a god(s) I hope for the lot of us that it is not the god from any religious book on earth.
Part 2: Why I don't follow any organized religions.
I hear this quite often "the church does good things like charity work and it creates a community of people".
What are the motives of the individuals doing the charity work? They (most likely) do it because they are told it is a good thing to do and not because it is just a good thing to do. Check out this video from Penn Jillette explaining why only atheists can be moral.
I am not saying that some of the charity work that churches do is not good, because most of it probably is. So, if the church was not there those people would not do the good things that they are currently doing with the church? This seems odd and to lead to the fact that they are only doing good deeds for some other purpose.
On the second point about communities; I think churches separate communities and people. It creates niche groups of people inside of communities. Instead of a town as one unit you have the Protestants and the Catholics or the Jews and the Muslims.
Dogma and power are also evils of organized religion. Only male authorities, traditions (drinking the blood of Christ), chosen peoples (Jehovah witnesses and Jews), the Vatican, and countless other dogmas. I want no part of that world. If I believed in god(s) I would worship in the privacy of my home. I do not need the pope telling me condoms are bad and I can not eat meat on Fridays for seven weeks.
On a bit of a side note I am not a sheep, so I don't need a shepherd.
Part 3: Why I do not believe in god(s).
How do I choose which god(s) to believe in? There are a countless list of gods plus all the other deities, saints, and/or demi-gods. So how do you pick one from a list like this one.
Evidence. I do not see any evidence for any gods. All because we cannot explain something does not mean a god did it. The lack of an explanation for something does not make it supernatural. I can not explain how magicians do some of their tricks but I know they are not actually magical.
I don't believe just 'cos ideas are tenacious it means they are worthy. - Tim Minchin
The gods use to make it rain, the sky use to be home of the gods, gods use to care about who people slept with or that you don't work on particular days, and gods use to create universes.
Religion has been evolving since it was invented by man to explain what they did not understand.
Today's religion will be the future's mythology. Both believed at one time by many; but proved wrong by the clever. - Steven Crocker
Conclusion
Hopefully I have answered the questions in an acceptable and coherent manner. My writing skills are not up to snuff for this type of writing, however, to improve one must step outside their comfort zone.
I plan on writing another entry about why I AM a non-believer, which should be much shorter and more interesting.
Have a nice day.
Do you deny the possibility that some sort of god, be it in the traditional sense or not, could exist?
ReplyDeleteI think the traditional god is absurd, however, sure there is a possibility that a god could exist. Invisible pink unicorns could also exist.
ReplyDeleteThe lack of an explanation does mean god(s) did it.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteTwo questions you didn't really address, 1) Do you still identify yourself as an atheist, and 2) how exactly do you define atheism?
ReplyDeleteI do not like to identify myself as an atheist, however, I do not find it insulting either. The point was brought to my attention by Sam Harris and he said "there is no term for being a non-racist, so why is there a term for being non-theistic" (not an exact quote).
ReplyDeleteAtheism - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism